articlePLoS ONEApr 7, 2010GOLD OA

“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences

University of Edinburgh

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

The hypothesis of a Hierarchy of the Sciences with physical sciences at the top, social sciences at the bottom, and biological sciences in-between is nearly 200 years old. This order is intuitive and reflected in many features of academic life, but whether it reflects the "hardness" of scientific research--i.e., the extent to which research questions and results are determined by data and theories as opposed to non-cognitive factors--is controversial. This study analysed 2434 papers published in all disciplines and that declared to have tested a hypothesis. It was determined how many papers reported a "positive" (full or partial) or "negative" support for the tested hypothesis. If the hierarchy hypothesis is…

Citation impact

749
total citations
FWCI
20.88
Percentile
100%
References
98
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Hierarchy
  • Biology
  • Political science
No related works found for this paper.

Funding