REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)
National Institutes of Health · National Cancer Institute · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Despite years of research and hundreds of reports on tumour markers in oncology, the number of markers that have emerged as clinically useful is pitifully small. Often initially reported studies of a marker show great promise, but subsequent studies on the same or related markers yield inconsistent conclusions or stand in direct contradiction to the promising results. It is imperative that we attempt to understand the reasons that multiple studies of the same marker lead to differing conclusions. A variety of methodological problems have been cited to explain these discrepancies. Unfortunately, many tumour marker studies have not been reported in a rigorous fashion, and published articles often lack sufficient…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 54
Authors
6Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- MEDLINE
- Cancer
- Statement (logic)
- Family medicine
- Oncology
- Pathology
- Internal medicine