articleHealth EconomicsJan 16, 2004Closed access

Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis

City, University of London

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

The decisions made by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) give rise to two questions: how is cost-effectiveness evidence used to make judgements about the 'value for money' of health technologies? And how are factors other than cost-effectiveness taken into account? The aim of this paper is to explore NICE's cost-effectiveness threshold(s) and the tradeoffs between cost effectiveness and other factors apparent in its decisions. Binary choice analysis is used to reveal the preferences of NICE and to consider the consistency of its decisions. For each decision to accept or reject a technology, explanatory variables include: the cost per life year or per QALY gained; uncertainty regarding cost…

Citation impact

708
total citations
FWCI
158.88
Percentile
100%
References
6
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Nice
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Excellence
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Quality-adjusted life year
  • Actuarial science
  • Health economics
  • Health technology
No related works found for this paper.