Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
The decisions made by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) give rise to two questions: how is cost-effectiveness evidence used to make judgements about the 'value for money' of health technologies? And how are factors other than cost-effectiveness taken into account? The aim of this paper is to explore NICE's cost-effectiveness threshold(s) and the tradeoffs between cost effectiveness and other factors apparent in its decisions. Binary choice analysis is used to reveal the preferences of NICE and to consider the consistency of its decisions. For each decision to accept or reject a technology, explanatory variables include: the cost per life year or per QALY gained; uncertainty regarding cost…
Citation impact
708
total citations
- FWCI
- 158.88
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 6
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Nice
- Cost effectiveness
- Excellence
- Context (archaeology)
- Quality-adjusted life year
- Actuarial science
- Health economics
- Health technology
No related works found for this paper.