reviewPsychological BulletinJan 1, 2011Closed access

The reliability and validity of discrete and continuous measures of psychopathology: A quantitative review.

University of Iowa · University of Minnesota

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

In 2 meta-analyses involving 58 studies and 59,575 participants, we quantitatively summarized the relative reliability and validity of continuous (i.e., dimensional) and discrete (i.e., categorical) measures of psychopathology. Overall, results suggest an expected 15% increase in reliability and 37% increase in validity through adoption of a continuous over discrete measure of psychopathology alone. This increase occurs across all types of samples and forms of psychopathology, with little evidence for exceptions. For typical observed effect sizes, the increase in validity is sufficient to almost halve sample sizes necessary to achieve standard power levels. With important caveats, the current results,…

Citation impact

658
total citations
FWCI
31.07
Percentile
100%
References
96
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychopathology
  • Categorical variable
  • Reliability (semiconductor)
  • Psychology
  • Validity
  • External validity
  • Incremental validity
  • Sample (material)
No related works found for this paper.