reviewJAMAJan 10, 2012GREEN OA

Prognostic Indices for Older Adults

University of California, San Francisco

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To assess the quality and limitations of prognostic indices for mortality in older adults through systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from their inception through November 2011. STUDY SELECTION: We included indices if they were validated and predicted absolute risk of mortality in patients whose average age was 60 years or older. We excluded indices that estimated intensive care unit, disease-specific, or in-hospital mortality. DATA EXTRACTION: For each prognostic index, we extracted data on clinical setting, potential for bias, generalizability, and accuracy.

Results

We reviewed 21,593 titles to identify 16 indices that predict risk of mortality from 6 months to 5 years for older adults in a variety of clinical settings: the community (6 indices), nursing home (2 indices), and hospital (8 indices). At least 1 measure of transportability (the index is accurate in more than 1 population) was tested for all but 3 indices. By our measures, no study was free from potential bias. Although 13 indices had C statistics of 0.70 or greater, none of the indices had C statistics of 0.90 or greater. Only 2 indices were independently validated by investigators who were not involved in the index's development.

Citation impact

721
total citations
FWCI
42.02
Percentile
100%
References
75
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Generalizability theory
  • Life expectancy
  • MEDLINE
  • Population
  • Cochrane Library
  • Gerontology
  • Meta-analysis
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.