articleJAMAOct 12, 2010Closed access

Transfusion Requirements After Cardiac Surgery

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To define whether a restrictive perioperative red blood cell transfusion strategy is as safe as a liberal strategy in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Transfusion Requirements After Cardiac Surgery (TRACS) study, a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical noninferiority trial conducted between February 2009 and February 2010 in an intensive care unit at a university hospital cardiac surgery referral center in Brazil. Consecutive adult patients (n = 502) who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were eligible; analysis was by intention-to-treat. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to a liberal strategy of blood transfusion (to maintain a hematocrit ≥30%) or to a restrictive strategy (hematocrit ≥24%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Composite end point of 30-day all-cause mortality and severe morbidity (cardiogenic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or acute renal injury requiring dialysis or hemofiltration) occurring during the hospital stay. The noninferiority margin was predefined at -8% (ie, 8% minimal clinically important increase in occurrence of the composite end point).

Results

Hemoglobin concentrations were maintained at a mean of 10.5 g/dL (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4-10.6) in the liberal-strategy group and 9.1 g/dL (95% CI, 9.0-9.2) in the restrictive-strategy group (P

Citation impact

1,029
total citations
FWCI
26.90
Percentile
100%
References
47
Citations per year

Authors

20

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Perioperative
  • Hematocrit
  • Cardiac surgery
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Hemofiltration
  • Blood transfusion
  • Intensive care unit
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.