reviewPsychological BulletinJan 1, 2006Closed access

Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis.

University of California, Riverside

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Disclosing information, thoughts, and feelings about personal and meaningful topics (experimental disclosure) is purported to have various health and psychological consequences (e.g., J. W. Pennebaker, 1993). Although the results of 2 small meta-analyses (P. G. Frisina, J. C. Borod, & S. J. Lepore, 2004; J. M. Smyth, 1998) suggest that experimental disclosure has a positive and significant effect, both used a fixed effects approach, limiting generalizability. Also, a plethora of studies on experimental disclosure have been completed that were not included in the previous analyses. One hundred forty-six randomized studies of experimental disclosure were collected and included in the present meta-analysis.…

Citation impact

1,493
total citations
FWCI
44.11
Percentile
100%
References
157
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Generalizability theory
  • Psychology
  • Meta-analysis
  • Self-disclosure
  • Feeling
  • Clinical psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Internal medicine
No related works found for this paper.

Funding