reviewMedical EducationMar 18, 2009Closed access

Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps

Mayo Clinic · New York University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

We summarise research on VPs, highlight the spectrum of potential variation and identify an agenda for future research. We also critically consider the role of VPs in the educational armamentarium.

Results

We propose that VPs' most unique and cost-effective function is to facilitate and assess the development of clinical reasoning. Clinical reasoning in experts involves a non-analytical process that matures through deliberate practice with multiple and varied clinical cases. Virtual patients are ideally suited to this task. Virtual patients can also be used in learner assessment, but scoring rubrics should emphasise non-analytical clinical reasoning rather than completeness of information or algorithmic approaches. Potential variations in VP design are practically limitless, yet few studies have rigorously explored design issues. More research is needed to inform instructional design and curricular integration.

Citation impact

623
total citations
FWCI
19.63
Percentile
100%
References
67
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • MEDLINE
  • Medical education
  • Medical physics
  • Medicine
  • Computer science
  • Psychology
  • Political science
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.