articleAmerican Economic ReviewApr 1, 2011Closed access

The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment

University of Warwick · University of East Anglia

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Plott and Zeiler (2005) report that the willingness-to-pay/willingness-to-accept disparity is absent for mugs in a particular experimental setting, designed to neutralize misconceptions about the procedures used to elicit valuations. This result has received sustained attention in the literature. However, other data from that same study, not published in that paper, exhibit a significant and persistent disparity when the same experimental procedures are applied to lotteries. We report new data confirming both results, thereby suggesting that the presence or absence of a disparity may be a more complex issue than some may have supposed. (JEL C91, D12, D81, D83)

Citation impact

627
total citations
FWCI
189.85
Percentile
100%
References
159
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Endowment effect
  • Willingness to pay
  • Willingness to accept
  • Endowment
  • Economics
  • Microeconomics
  • Econometrics
  • Law
No related works found for this paper.

Funding