reviewJournal of ObesityJan 1, 2014GOLD OA

The Weight-Inclusive versus Weight-Normative Approach to Health: Evaluating the Evidence for Prioritizing Well-Being over Weight Loss

The Ohio State University · Fordham University · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Using an ethical lens, this review evaluates two methods of working within patient care and public health: the weight-normative approach (emphasis on weight and weight loss when defining health and well-being) and the weight-inclusive approach (emphasis on viewing health and well-being as multifaceted while directing efforts toward improving health access and reducing weight stigma). Data reveal that the weight-normative approach is not effective for most people because of high rates of weight regain and cycling from weight loss interventions, which are linked to adverse health and well-being. Its predominant focus on weight may also foster stigma in health care and society, and data show that weight stigma is…

Citation impact

585
total citations
FWCI
33.68
Percentile
100%
References
173
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Normative
  • Weight stigma
  • Weight loss
  • Stigma (botany)
  • Medicine
  • Health care
  • Psychological intervention
  • Gerontology
No related works found for this paper.