Auditor Independence, Non‐Audit Services, and Restatements: Was the U.S. Government Right?*
University of Southern California · American College of Financial Services · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Do fees for non‐audit services compromise auditor's independence and result in reduced quality of financial reporting? The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 presumes that some fees do and bans these services for audit clients. Also, some registrants voluntarily restrict their audit firms from providing legally permitted non‐audit services. Assuming that restatements of previously issued financial statements reflect low‐quality financial reporting, we investigate detailed fees for restating registrants for 1995 to 2000 and for similar nonrestating registrants. We do not find a statistically significant positive association between fees for either financial information systems design and implementation or internal…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 67.50
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 22
Authors
3- WRWilliam R. KinneyCorresponding
University of Southern California, American College of Financial Services, California Southern University, The University of Texas at Austin
- ZPZoe‐Vonna PalmroseCorresponding
University of Southern California, American College of Financial Services, California Southern University, The University of Texas at Austin
- SSSusan ScholzCorresponding
University of Southern California, American College of Financial Services, California Southern University, The University of Texas at Austin
Topics & keywords
- Audit
- Accounting
- Business
- Auditor independence
- Joint audit
- Quality audit
- Audit evidence
- Chief audit executive
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions