reviewRoyal Society Open ScienceNov 1, 2014GOLD OA

An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p -values

University College London

PubMed
Indexed inarxivcrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. If, as is often the case, experiments are underpowered, you will be wrong most of the time. This conclusion is demonstrated from several points of view. First, tree diagrams which show the close analogy with the screening test problem. Similar conclusions are drawn by repeated simulations of t-tests. These mimic what is done in real life, which makes the results more persuasive. The simulation method is used also to evaluate the extent to which effect sizes are over-estimated, especially in underpowered experiments. A script is supplied to allow the reader to do simulations themselves, with numbers…

Citation impact

707
total citations
FWCI
73.14
Percentile
100%
References
16
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • False discovery rate
  • Computer science
  • Analogy
  • Word (group theory)
  • Tree (set theory)
  • Statistics
  • Machine learning
  • Artificial intelligence
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.