articleJAMAJun 24, 2014BRONZE OA

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation vs Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis

Newcastle University · Université Paris Cité · +40 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have shown efficacy in systemic sclerosis in phase 1 and small phase 2 trials.

Objective

To compare efficacy and safety of HSCT vs 12 successive monthly intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma (ASTIS) trial, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, clinical trial conducted in 10 countries at 29 centers with access to a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation-registered transplant facility. From March 2001 to October 2009, 156 patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis were recruited and followed up until October 31, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: HSCT vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was event-free survival, defined as time from randomization until the occurrence of death or persistent major organ failure.

Citation impact

735
total citations
FWCI
41.10
Percentile
100%
References
28
Citations per year

Authors

45

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Transplantation
  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Clinical endpoint
  • Randomization
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding