reviewArchives of General PsychiatryJun 1, 2003Closed access

A Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antipsychotics

University of Illinois Chicago

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Consensus panel recommendations regarding choice of an antipsychotic agent for schizophrenia differ markedly, but most consider second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) as a homogeneous group. It has been suggested that SGAs seem falsely more efficacious than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) as a result of reduced efficacy due to use of a high-dose comparator, haloperidol. We performed (1) a meta-analysis of randomized efficacy trials comparing SGAs and FGAs, (2) comparisons between SGAs, (3) a dose-response analysis of FGAs and SGAs, and (4) an analysis of the effect on efficacy of an overly high dose of an FGA comparator.

Methods

Literature search of clinical trials between January 1953 and May 2002 of patients with schizophrenia from electronic databases, reference lists, posters, the Food and Drug Administration, and other unpublished data. We included 124 randomized controlled trials with efficacy data on 10 SGAs vs FGAs and 18 studies of comparisons between SGAs. Two of us independently extracted the sample sizes, means, and standard deviation of the efficacy data.

Citation impact

1,016
total citations
FWCI
49.10
Percentile
100%
References
158
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychology
  • MEDLINE
  • Psychiatry
  • Medicine
  • Political science
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.