articleJournal of Chemical Information and ModelingFeb 9, 2007Closed access

Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods:  Good and Bad Metrics for the “Early Recognition” Problem

TransCanada (Canada)

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Many metrics are currently used to evaluate the performance of ranking methods in virtual screening (VS), for instance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the area under the accumulation curve (AUAC), the average rank of actives, the enrichment factor (EF), and the robust initial enhancement (RIE) proposed by Sheridan et al. In this work, we show that the ROC, the AUAC, and the average rank metrics have the same inappropriate behaviors that make them poor metrics for comparing VS methods whose purpose is to rank actives early in an ordered list (the "early recognition problem"). In doing so, we derive mathematical formulas that relate those metrics together. Moreover, we show…

Citation impact

854
total citations
FWCI
43.58
Percentile
100%
References
19
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Computer science
  • Virtual screening
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Pattern recognition (psychology)
  • Bioinformatics
  • Drug discovery
  • Biology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.