Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Abstract
Divergent thinking is central to the study of individual differences in creativity, but the traditional scoring systems (assigning points for infrequent responses and summing the points) face well-known problems. After critically reviewing past scoring methods, this article describes a new approach to assessing divergent thinking and appraises its reliability and validity. In our new Top 2 scoring method, participants complete a divergent thinking task and then circle the two responses that they think are their most creative responses. Raters then evaluate the responses on a 5-point scale. Regarding reliability, a generalizability analysis showed that subjective ratings of unusual-uses tasks and instances…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 74
Authors
8- PJPaul J. SilviaCorresponding
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
- BPBeate P. Winterstein
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
- JTJohn T. Willse
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
- CMChristopher M. Barona
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
- JTJoshua T. Cram
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Topics & keywords
- Creativity
- Psychology
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- Divergent thinking
- Validity
- Cognitive psychology
- Social psychology
- Psychometrics