Monitoring Depression Treatment Outcomes With the Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Regenstrief Institute · Heidelberg University · +3 more institutions
Abstract
Although effective treatment of depressed patients requires regular follow-up contacts and symptom monitoring, an efficient method for assessing treatment outcome is lacking. We investigated responsiveness to treatment, reproducibility, and minimal clinically important difference of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a standard instrument for diagnosing depression in primary care.
This study included 434 intervention subjects from the IMPACT study, a multisite treatment trial of late-life depression (63% female, mean age 71 years). Changes in PHQ-9 scores over the course of time were evaluated with respect to change scores of the SCL-20 depression scale as well as 2 independent structured diagnostic interviews for depression during a 6-month period. Test-retest reliability and minimal clinically important difference were assessed in 2 subgroups of patients who completed the PHQ-9 twice exactly 7 days apart.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 45
Authors
5- BLBernd L weCorresponding
Regenstrief Institute, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Heidelberg, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
- JUJ??rgen Un??tzer
- CMChristopher M. Callahan
Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
- AJAnthony J. Perkins
Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
- KKKurt Kroenke
Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Topics & keywords
- Patient Health Questionnaire
- Medicine
- Depression (economics)
- Minimal clinically important difference
- Physical therapy
- Severity of illness
- Depressive symptoms
- Randomized controlled trial