Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies

University of Kansas · Mississippi State University · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Vignette-based methodologies are frequently used to examine judgments and decision-making processes, including clinical judgments made by health professionals. Concerns are sometimes raised that vignettes do not accurately reflect “real world” phenomena, and that this affects the validity of results and conclusions of these studies. This article provides an overview of the defining features, design variations, strengths, and weaknesses of vignette studies as a way of examining how health professionals form clinical judgments (e.g., assigning diagnoses, selecting treatments). As a “hybrid” of traditional survey and experimental methods, vignette studies can offer aspects of both the high internal validity of…

Citation impact

671
total citations
FWCI
131.77
Percentile
100%
References
67
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Vignette
  • External validity
  • Psychology
  • Medical diagnosis
  • Applied psychology
  • Psychotherapist
  • Social psychology
  • Medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.