Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies
University of Kansas · Mississippi State University · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Vignette-based methodologies are frequently used to examine judgments and decision-making processes, including clinical judgments made by health professionals. Concerns are sometimes raised that vignettes do not accurately reflect “real world” phenomena, and that this affects the validity of results and conclusions of these studies. This article provides an overview of the defining features, design variations, strengths, and weaknesses of vignette studies as a way of examining how health professionals form clinical judgments (e.g., assigning diagnoses, selecting treatments). As a “hybrid” of traditional survey and experimental methods, vignette studies can offer aspects of both the high internal validity of…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 131.77
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 67
Authors
10Topics & keywords
- Vignette
- External validity
- Psychology
- Medical diagnosis
- Applied psychology
- Psychotherapist
- Social psychology
- Medicine
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions