articleEducational PsychologistOct 1, 2011Closed access

The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems

Decision Systems (United States) · Arizona State University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Abstract This article is a review of experiments comparing the effectiveness of human tutoring, computer tutoring, and no tutoring. “No tutoring” refers to instruction that teaches the same content without tutoring. The computer tutoring systems were divided by their granularity of the user interface interaction into answer-based, step-based, and substep-based tutoring systems. Most intelligent tutoring systems have step-based or substep-based granularities of interaction, whereas most other tutoring systems (often called CAI, CBT, or CAL systems) have answer-based user interfaces. It is widely believed as the granularity of tutoring decreases, the effectiveness increases. In particular, when compared to No…

Citation impact

1,904
total citations
FWCI
71.65
Percentile
100%
References
135
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Intelligent tutoring system
  • Computer science
  • Multimedia
  • Educational psychology
  • Granularity
  • Human–computer interaction
  • Mathematics education
  • Artificial intelligence
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.