articleBMC BioinformaticsNov 30, 2010GOLD OA

Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis

Northwestern University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

High-throughput profiling of DNA methylation status of CpG islands is crucial to understand the epigenetic regulation of genes. The microarray-based Infinium methylation assay by Illumina is one platform for low-cost high-throughput methylation profiling. Both Beta-value and M-value statistics have been used as metrics to measure methylation levels. However, there are no detailed studies of their relations and their strengths and limitations.

Results

We demonstrate that the relationship between the Beta-value and M-value methods is a Logit transformation, and show that the Beta-value method has severe heteroscedasticity for highly methylated or unmethylated CpG sites. In order to evaluate the performance of the Beta-value and M-value methods for identifying differentially methylated CpG sites, we designed a methylation titration experiment. The evaluation results show that the M-value method provides much better performance in terms of Detection Rate (DR) and True Positive Rate (TPR) for both highly methylated and unmethylated CpG sites. Imposing a minimum threshold of difference can improve the performance of the M-value method but not the Beta-value method. We also provide guidance for how to select the threshold of methylation differences.

Citation impact

2,297
total citations
FWCI
17.69
Percentile
100%
References
20
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Methylation
  • DNA methylation
  • CpG site
  • Epigenetics
  • Computational biology
  • Value (mathematics)
  • Biology
  • Statistics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Life below water
No related works found for this paper.

Funding