articleJAMAJul 11, 2004Closed access

Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir DF vs Stavudine in Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients<SUBTITLE>A 3-Year Randomized Trial</SUBTITLE>

Johns Hopkins University · Johns Hopkins Medicine

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF compared with stavudine in antiretroviral-naive patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study conducted at 81 centers in the United States, South America, and Europe from June 9, 2000, to January 30, 2004. A total of 753 patients infected with HIV who were antiretroviral naive were screened and 602 patients entered the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either tenofovir DF (n = 299) or stavudine (n = 303), with placebo, in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients with HIV RNA levels of less than 400 copies/mL at week 48.

Results

In the primary intent-to-treat analysis in which patients with missing data or who added or switched antiretroviral medications before week 48 were considered as failures, the proportion of patients with HIV RNA of less than 400 copies/mL at week 48 was 239 (80%) of 299 in patients receiving tenofovir DF and 253 (84%) of 301 in patients receiving stavudine (95% confidence interval, -10.4% to 1.5%), exceeding the predefined -10% limit for equivalence. However, equivalence was demonstrated in the secondary analyses (HIV RNA

Citation impact

1,344
total citations
FWCI
59.20
Percentile
100%
References
21
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Stavudine
  • Lamivudine
  • Medicine
  • Efavirenz
  • Didanosine
  • Reverse-transcriptase inhibitor
  • Internal medicine
  • Confidence interval
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding