SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Systematic Reviews (SRs) of experimental animal studies are not yet common practice, but awareness of the merits of conducting such SRs is steadily increasing. As animal intervention studies differ from randomized clinical trials (RCT) in many aspects, the methodology for SRs of clinical trials needs to be adapted and optimized for animal intervention studies. The Cochrane Collaboration developed a Risk of Bias (RoB) tool to establish consistency and avoid discrepancies in assessing the methodological quality of RCTs. A similar initiative is warranted in the field of animal experimentation.
We provide an RoB tool for animal intervention studies (SYRCLE's RoB tool). This tool is based on the Cochrane RoB tool and has been adjusted for aspects of bias that play a specific role in animal intervention studies. To enhance transparency and applicability, we formulated signalling questions to facilitate judgment.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 64.26
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 43
Authors
6- CRCarlijn R. HooijmansCorresponding
Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center
- MMMaroeska M. Rovers
Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen
- RBRob BM de Vries
Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center
- MLMarlies Leenaars
Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen
- MRMerel Ritskes‐Hoitinga
Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center
Topics & keywords
- Critical appraisal
- Publication bias
- Animal testing
- Medicine
- Meta-analysis
- Intervention (counseling)
- Systematic review
- Consistency (knowledge bases)