articleSpineApr 1, 2008Closed access

Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique

Witten/Herdecke University · St. Anna Hospital · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

Comparison of results of lumbar discectomies in full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal technique with the conventional microsurgical technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Even with good results, conventional disc operations may result in subsequent damage due to trauma. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer intraoperatively and after surgery. With the transforaminal and interlaminar techniques, 2 full-endoscopic procedures are available for lumbar disc operations.

Methods

One hundred seventy-eight patients with full-endoscopic or microsurgical discectomy underwent follow-up for 2 years. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: VAS, German version North American Spine Society Instrument, Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.

Citation impact

854
total citations
FWCI
7.42
Percentile
100%
References
140
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Microsurgery
  • Lumbar
  • Discectomy
  • Diskectomy
  • Back pain
  • Endoscopy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.