articleJournal of Cardiovascular ElectrophysiologyAug 26, 2004Closed access

Differences in Tachyarrhythmia Detection and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy by Primary or Secondary Prevention Indication in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients

Cleveland Clinic · Cleveland Foundation · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although numerous trials have shown benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for either primary or secondary prevention, no trial has prospectively enrolled patients from both indications and analyzed ICD utilization between groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective review of MIRACLE ICD, a randomized, prospective double-blind trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the ICD population. Both secondary prevention (N = 563) and primary prevention patients (N = 415) were enrolled. Subgroup analysis for frequency of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes and detection accuracy revealed that primary prevention patients had a…

Citation impact

833
total citations
FWCI
7.35
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Internal medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Primary prevention
  • Secondary prevention
  • Ventricular tachycardia
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.