articleBioethicsJun 1, 2005Closed access

IN DEFENSE OF POSTHUMAN DIGNITY

University of Oxford

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Positions on the ethics of human enhancement technologies can be (crudely) characterized as ranging from transhumanism to bioconservatism. Transhumanists believe that human enhancement technologies should be made widely available, that individuals should have broad discretion over which of these technologies to apply to themselves, and that parents should normally have the right to choose enhancements for their children-to-be. Bioconservatives (whose ranks include such diverse writers as Leon Kass, Francis Fukuyama, George Annas, Wesley Smith, Jeremy Rifkin, and Bill McKibben) are generally opposed to the use of technology to modify human nature. A central idea in bioconservativism is that human enhancement…

Citation impact

642
total citations
FWCI
4.21
Percentile
100%
References
3
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Posthuman
  • Transhumanism
  • Dignity
  • Human enhancement
  • Environmental ethics
  • Posthumanism
  • Sociology
  • Slippery slope
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.