articleMedical CareMay 23, 2013GREEN OA

Why Summary Comorbidity Measures Such As the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Score Work

Johns Hopkins University · Fox Chase Cancer Center · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Comorbidity adjustment is an important component of health services research and clinical prognosis. When adjusting for comorbidities in statistical models, researchers can include comorbidities individually or through the use of summary measures such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index or Elixhauser score. We examined the conditions under which individual versus summary measures are most appropriate.

Methods

We provide an analytic proof of the utility of comorbidity summary measures when used in place of individual comorbidities. We compared the use of the Charlson and Elixhauser scores versus individual comorbidities in prognostic models using a SEER-Medicare data example. We examined the ability of summary comorbidity measures to adjust for confounding using simulations.

No related works found for this paper.