Why Summary Comorbidity Measures Such As the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Score Work
Johns Hopkins University · Fox Chase Cancer Center · +1 more institution
Abstract
Comorbidity adjustment is an important component of health services research and clinical prognosis. When adjusting for comorbidities in statistical models, researchers can include comorbidities individually or through the use of summary measures such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index or Elixhauser score. We examined the conditions under which individual versus summary measures are most appropriate.
We provide an analytic proof of the utility of comorbidity summary measures when used in place of individual comorbidities. We compared the use of the Charlson and Elixhauser scores versus individual comorbidities in prognostic models using a SEER-Medicare data example. We examined the ability of summary comorbidity measures to adjust for confounding using simulations.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 25
Authors
5Topics & keywords
- Comorbidity
- Confounding
- Medicine
- Charlson comorbidity index
- Psychiatry
- Internal medicine