reviewJournal of Applied PsychologyAug 15, 2011Closed access

The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis.

Leiden University · University of Amsterdam · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Since the meta-analysis by De Dreu and Weingart (2003b) on the effects of intragroup conflict on group outcomes, more than 80 new empirical studies of conflict have been conducted, often investigating more complex, moderated relationships between conflict and group outcomes, as well as new types of intragroup conflict, such as process conflict. To explore the trends in this new body of literature, we conducted a meta-analysis of 116 empirical studies of intragroup conflict (n = 8,880 groups) and its relationship with group outcomes. To address the heterogeneity across the studies included in the meta-analysis, we also investigated a number of moderating variables. Stable negative relationships were found…

Citation impact

1,170
total citations
FWCI
139.06
Percentile
100%
References
195
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Moderation
  • Psychology
  • Meta-analysis
  • Social psychology
  • Conflict management
  • Group conflict
  • Task (project management)
  • Decision quality
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.