What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Abstract
"Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?" (Sandelowski, 2000) was written to critique the prevailing tendency in qualitative health research to claim the use of methods that were not actually used and to clarify a methodological approach rarely identified as a distinctive method. The article has generated several misconceptions, most notably that qualitative description requires no interpretation of data. At the root of these misconceptions is the persistent challenge of defining qualitative research methods. Qualitative description is a "distributed residual category" (Bowker & Star, 2000). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) in the classification of these methods. Its value lies not only in the knowledge its…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 148.91
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 48
Authors
1Topics & keywords
- Qualitative research
- Interpretation (philosophy)
- Value (mathematics)
- Epistemology
- Sociology
- Psychology
- Computer science
- Linguistics