A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
A Monte Carlo study compared 14 methods to test the statistical significance of the intervening variable effect. An intervening variable (mediator) transmits the effect of an independent variable to a dependent variable. The commonly used R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) approach has low statistical power. Two methods based on the distribution of the product and 2 difference-in-coefficients methods have the most accurate Type I error rates and greatest statistical power except in 1 important case in which Type I error rates are too high. The best balance of Type I error and statistical power across all cases is the test of the joint significance of the two effects comprising the intervening variable effect.
Citation impact
9,113
total citations
- FWCI
- 116.23
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 72
Citations per year
Authors
5Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Type I and type II errors
- Statistics
- Statistical significance
- Statistical hypothesis testing
- Variable (mathematics)
- Statistical power
- Variables
- Mediation
No related works found for this paper.