articlePsychological MethodsJan 1, 2002GREEN OA

A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.

Arizona State University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

A Monte Carlo study compared 14 methods to test the statistical significance of the intervening variable effect. An intervening variable (mediator) transmits the effect of an independent variable to a dependent variable. The commonly used R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) approach has low statistical power. Two methods based on the distribution of the product and 2 difference-in-coefficients methods have the most accurate Type I error rates and greatest statistical power except in 1 important case in which Type I error rates are too high. The best balance of Type I error and statistical power across all cases is the test of the joint significance of the two effects comprising the intervening variable effect.

Citation impact

9,113
total citations
FWCI
116.23
Percentile
100%
References
72
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Type I and type II errors
  • Statistics
  • Statistical significance
  • Statistical hypothesis testing
  • Variable (mathematics)
  • Statistical power
  • Variables
  • Mediation
No related works found for this paper.