reviewArchives of Internal MedicineNov 27, 2006Closed access

Collaborative Care for Depression

University of York

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Depression is common in primary care but is suboptimally managed. Collaborative care, that is, structured care involving a greater role of nonmedical specialists to augment primary care, has emerged as a potentially effective candidate intervention to improve quality of primary care and patient outcomes.

Methods

To quantify the short-term and longer-term effectiveness of collaborative care compared with standard care and to understand mechanisms of action by exploring between-study heterogeneity, we conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that compared collaborative care with usual primary care in patients with depression. We searched MEDLINE (from the beginning of 1966), EMBASE (from the beginning of 1980), CINAHL (from the beginning of 1980), PsycINFO (from the beginning of 1980), the Cochrane Library (from the beginning of 1966), and DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness) (from the beginning of 1985) databases from study inception to February 6, 2006.

Citation impact

1,325
total citations
FWCI
63.51
Percentile
100%
References
70
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • PsycINFO
  • Meta-analysis
  • CINAHL
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Medicine
  • MEDLINE
  • Confidence interval
  • Collaborative Care
No related works found for this paper.