reviewJAMAFeb 17, 2009Closed access

Cancer Survivors and Unemployment

Academic Medical Center · Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To assess the association of cancer survivorship with unemployment compared with healthy controls. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of studies published between 1966 and June 2008 was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and OSH-ROM databases. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies included adult cancer survivors and a control group, and employment as an outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Pooled relative risks were calculated over all studies and according to cancer type. A Bayesian meta-regression analysis was performed to assess associations of unemployment with cancer type, country of origin, average age at diagnosis, and background unemployment rate.

Results

Twenty-six articles describing 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analyses included 20,366 cancer survivors and 157,603 healthy control participants. Studies included 16 from the United States, 15 from Europe, and 5 from other countries. Overall, cancer survivors were more likely to be unemployed than healthy control participants (33.8% vs 15.2%; pooled relative risk [RR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.55). Unemployment was higher in breast cancer survivors compared with control participants (35.6% vs 31.7%; pooled RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.49), as well as in survivors of gastrointestinal cancers (48.8% vs 33.4%; pooled RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.02-2.05), and cancers of the female reproductive organs (49.1% vs 38.3%; pooled RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40). Unemployment rates were not higher for survivors of blood cancers compared with controls (30.6% vs 23.7%; pooled RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.95-2.09), prostate cancers (39.4% vs 27.1%; pooled RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25), or testicular cancer (18.5% vs 18.1%; pooled RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.20). For survivors in the United States, the unemployment risk was 1.5 times higher compared with survivors in Europe (meta-RR, 1.48; 95% credibility interval, 1.15-1.95). After adjustment for diagnosis, age, and background unemployment rate, this risk disappeared (meta-RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.85-1.83).

Citation impact

781
total citations
FWCI
19.41
Percentile
100%
References
60
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Survivorship curve
  • Cancer
  • Confidence interval
  • Relative risk
  • Demography
  • CINAHL
  • Meta-analysis
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Decent work and economic growth
No related works found for this paper.