editorialInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric ResearchJan 1, 2006BRONZE OA

Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys

JMJosep María HaroSAS. Arbabzadeh‐BouchezTBTraolach BrughaGDGiovanni de GirolamoMGMargaret Guyer

Hôpital Fernand-Widal · University of Leicester · +6 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

The DSM-IV diagnoses generated by the fully structured lay-administered Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) in the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys were compared to diagnoses based on follow-up interviews with the clinician-administered non-patient edition of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) in probability subsamples of the WMH surveys in France, Italy, Spain, and the US. CIDI cases were oversampled. The clinical reappraisal samples were weighted to adjust for this oversampling. Separate samples were assessed for lifetime and 12-month prevalence. Moderate to good individual-level CIDI-SCID concordance was found for lifetime prevalence estimates of most…

Citation impact

1,078
total citations
FWCI
48.81
Percentile
100%
References
47
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Topics
Keywords
  • CIDI
  • Concordance
  • Mood
  • Medical diagnosis
  • Generalized anxiety disorder
  • Medicine
  • Anxiety
  • Quartile
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding