articlePublic Health NutritionApr 11, 2011BRONZE OA

Comparison of relative validity of food group intakes estimated by comprehensive and brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaires against 16 d dietary records in Japanese adults

The University of Tokyo · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To compare the relative validity of food group intakes derived from a comprehensive self-administered diet history questionnaire (DHQ) and a brief-type DHQ (BDHQ) developed for the assessment of Japanese diets during the previous month using semi-weighed dietary records (DR) as a reference method.

Design

Between November 2002 and September 2003, a 4 d DR (covering four non-consecutive days), a DHQ (150-item semi-quantitative questionnaire) and a BDHQ (fifty-eight-item fixed-portion-type questionnaire) were completed four times (once per season) at 3-month intervals.

Citation impact

880
total citations
FWCI
25.63
Percentile
100%
References
28
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Demography
  • Food frequency questionnaire
  • Food group
  • Animal science
  • Environmental health
  • Biology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Zero hunger
No related works found for this paper.

Funding