articleNew England Journal of MedicineOct 13, 2004BRONZE OA

A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Center for Vascular Biology Research · University of Groningen · +6 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Although the initial results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms were promising, current evidence from controlled studies does not convincingly show a reduction in 30-day mortality relative to that achieved with open repair.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing open repair with endovascular repair in 345 patients who had received a diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm of at least 5 cm in diameter and who were considered suitable candidates for both techniques. The outcome events analyzed were operative (30-day) mortality and two composite end points of operative mortality and severe complications and operative mortality and moderate or severe complications.

Citation impact

2,012
total citations
FWCI
81.35
Percentile
100%
References
31
Citations per year

Authors

9

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Confidence interval
  • Surgery
  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Relative risk
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Aneurysm
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.