A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Center for Vascular Biology Research · University of Groningen · +6 more institutions
Abstract
Although the initial results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms were promising, current evidence from controlled studies does not convincingly show a reduction in 30-day mortality relative to that achieved with open repair.
We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing open repair with endovascular repair in 345 patients who had received a diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm of at least 5 cm in diameter and who were considered suitable candidates for both techniques. The outcome events analyzed were operative (30-day) mortality and two composite end points of operative mortality and severe complications and operative mortality and moderate or severe complications.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 81.35
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 31
Authors
9Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Confidence interval
- Surgery
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm
- Relative risk
- Randomized controlled trial
- Aneurysm
- Internal medicine
- Good health and well-being