reviewJournal of Health Services Research & PolicyJan 1, 2002Closed access

Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice

MRC Biostatistics Unit

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

Heterogeneity between study results can be a problem in any systematic review or meta-analysis of clinical trials. Identifying its presence, investigating its cause and correctly accounting for it in analyses all involve difficult decisions for the researcher. Our objectives were: to collate recommendations on the subject of dealing with heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials; to investigate current practice in addressing heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews; and to compare current practice with recommendations.

Methods

We review guidelines for those undertaking systematic reviews and examine how heterogeneity is addressed in practice in a sample of systematic reviews, and their protocols, from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Citation impact

758
total citations
FWCI
22.49
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Systematic review
  • Meta-analysis
  • MEDLINE
  • Meta-regression
  • Sample size determination
  • Critical appraisal
  • Publication bias
  • Spurious relationship
No related works found for this paper.