Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice
Abstract
Heterogeneity between study results can be a problem in any systematic review or meta-analysis of clinical trials. Identifying its presence, investigating its cause and correctly accounting for it in analyses all involve difficult decisions for the researcher. Our objectives were: to collate recommendations on the subject of dealing with heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials; to investigate current practice in addressing heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews; and to compare current practice with recommendations.
We review guidelines for those undertaking systematic reviews and examine how heterogeneity is addressed in practice in a sample of systematic reviews, and their protocols, from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 22.49
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 30
Authors
4Topics & keywords
- Systematic review
- Meta-analysis
- MEDLINE
- Meta-regression
- Sample size determination
- Critical appraisal
- Publication bias
- Spurious relationship