Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions
University College London · University of London · +3 more institutions
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Most randomised controlled trials focus on outcomes, not on the processes involved in implementing an intervention. Using an example from school based health promotion, this paper argues that including a process evaluation would improve the science of many randomised controlled trials
Citation impact
1,291
total citations
- FWCI
- 65.64
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 26
Citations per year
Authors
5- AOAnn OakleyCorresponding
University College London, University of London
- VSVicki Strange
University of London
- CBChris Bonell
Environmental Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
- EAElizabeth Allen
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research
- JSJudith Stephenson
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research
Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Psychological intervention
- Intervention (counseling)
- Process (computing)
- Randomized controlled trial
- Promotion (chess)
- Health promotion
- Alternative medicine
- Medicine
No related works found for this paper.