articleJAMAJan 16, 2002Closed access

Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer<SUBTITLE>A Randomized Trial</SUBTITLE>

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

ContextLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) has emerged as the preferred minimally invasive surgical strategy for diseases of the colon. The safety and efficacy of LAC for colon cancer are unknown, and the nature and magnitude of any quality-of-life (QOL) benefit resulting from LAC for colon cancer is also unknown.ObjectiveTo compare short-term QOL outcomes after LAC vs open colectomy for colon cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter, randomized controlled trial (Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy [COST]). Between September 1994 and February 1999, 37 of 48 centers provided data for the QOL component of the trial for 449 consecutive patients with clinically resectable colon cancer.Main Outcome…

Citation impact

727
total citations
FWCI
49.02
Percentile
100%
References
29
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Quality of life (healthcare)
  • Colectomy
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Rating scale
No related works found for this paper.