Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field
University of London · London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Policy-makers and managers have always used a wide range of sources of evidence in making decisions about policy and the organization of services. However, they are under increasing pressure to adopt a more systematic approach to the utilization of the complex evidence base. Decision-makers must address complicated questions about the nature and significance of the problem to be addressed; the nature of proposed interventions; their differential impact; cost-effectiveness; acceptability and so on. This means that Cochrane-style reviews alone are not sufficient. Rather, they require access to syntheses of high-quality evidence that include research and non-research sources, and both qualitative and quantitative…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 39.70
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 41
Authors
3Topics & keywords
- Management science
- Qualitative research
- Narrative
- Thematic analysis
- Computer science
- Systematic review
- Psychological intervention
- Knowledge management
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions