reviewAmerican PsychologistJan 1, 2005Closed access

Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Science?: A Critical Review.

Harvard University · Harvard University Press

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

This article considers 3 claims that cognitive sex differences account for the differential representation of men and women in high-level careers in mathematics and science: (a) males are more focused on objects from the beginning of life and therefore are predisposed to better learning about mechanical systems; (b) males have a profile of spatial and numerical abilities producing greater aptitude for mathematics; and (c) males are more variable in their cognitive abilities and therefore predominate at the upper reaches of mathematical talent. Research on cognitive development in human infants, preschool children, and students at all levels fails to support these claims. Instead, it provides evidence that…

Citation impact

751
total citations
FWCI
25.45
Percentile
100%
References
153
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Aptitude
  • Cognition
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Representation (politics)
  • Spatial ability
  • Mathematics education
  • Psychology
  • Developmental psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.