articleJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyMar 24, 2008Closed access

On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.

University of Toronto · James Madison University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

In 7 different studies, the authors observed that a large number of thinking biases are uncorrelated with cognitive ability. These thinking biases include some of the most classic and well-studied biases in the heuristics and biases literature, including the conjunction effect, framing effects, anchoring effects, outcome bias, base-rate neglect, "less is more" effects, affect biases, omission bias, myside bias, sunk-cost effect, and certainty effects that violate the axioms of expected utility theory. In a further experiment, the authors nonetheless showed that cognitive ability does correlate with the tendency to avoid some rational thinking biases, specifically the tendency to display denominator neglect,…

Citation impact

841
total citations
FWCI
14.47
Percentile
100%
References
198
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychology
  • Debiasing
  • Cognitive bias
  • Heuristics
  • Neglect
  • Confirmation bias
  • Framing effect
  • Cognitive psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.

Funding