articleJournal of Applied PsychologyMay 1, 2008Closed access

Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.

North Carolina State University · Center for Creative Leadership

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance (MI) based on the chi-square statistic are known to be highly sensitive to sample size. For this reason, G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold (2002) recommended using alternative fit indices (AFIs) in MI investigations. In this article, the authors investigated the performance of AFIs with simulated data known to not be invariant. The results indicate that AFIs are much less sensitive to sample size and are more sensitive to a lack of invariance than chi-square-based tests of MI. The authors suggest reporting differences in comparative fit index (CFI) and R. P. McDonald's (1989) noncentrality index (NCI) to evaluate whether MI exists. Although a general…

Citation impact

1,657
total citations
FWCI
18.82
Percentile
100%
References
52
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Measurement invariance
  • Statistic
  • Statistics
  • Confirmatory factor analysis
  • Sample size determination
  • Psychology
  • Chi-square test
  • Index (typography)
No related works found for this paper.