articleNew England Journal of MedicineFeb 13, 2007BRONZE OA

A Pooled Analysis of Data Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents with Bare-Metal Stents

Délégation Paris 5 · Inserm · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Although randomized studies have shown a beneficial effect of drug-eluting stents in reducing the risk of repeated revascularization, these trials were underpowered to compare rates of death and myocardial infarction. The long-term safety of drug-eluting stents has been questioned recently.

Methods

We performed a pooled analysis of 1748 patients in four randomized trials evaluating the safety of sirolimus-eluting stents as compared with bare-metal stents. Patient-level data were obtained and analyzed by independent statisticians at two academic institutions. The primary safety end point was survival at 4 years. We tested for heterogeneities in treatment effect in patient subgroups.

Citation impact

705
total citations
FWCI
122.59
Percentile
100%
References
23
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Sirolimus
  • Hazard ratio
  • Stent
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Bare metal
  • Confidence interval
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.