articleBMC BioinformaticsJul 10, 2009GOLD OA

A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data

Heidelberg University · KU Leuven · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

Regularized regression methods such as principal component or partial least squares regression perform well in learning tasks on high dimensional spectral data, but cannot explicitly eliminate irrelevant features. The random forest classifier with its associated Gini feature importance, on the other hand, allows for an explicit feature elimination, but may not be optimally adapted to spectral data due to the topology of its constituent classification trees which are based on orthogonal splits in feature space.

Results

We propose to combine the best of both approaches, and evaluated the joint use of a feature selection based on a recursive feature elimination using the Gini importance of random forests' together with regularized classification methods on spectral data sets from medical diagnostics, chemotaxonomy, biomedical analytics, food science, and synthetically modified spectral data. Here, a feature selection using the Gini feature importance with a regularized classification by discriminant partial least squares regression performed as well as or better than a filtering according to different univariate statistical tests, or using regression coefficients in a backward feature elimination. It outperformed the direct application of the random forest classifier, or the direct application of the regularized classifiers on the full set of features.

Citation impact

1,305
total citations
FWCI
8.93
Percentile
100%
References
47
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Random forest
  • Feature selection
  • Pattern recognition (psychology)
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Linear discriminant analysis
  • Classifier (UML)
  • Feature (linguistics)
  • Mathematics
No related works found for this paper.

Funding