reviewJAMAJun 15, 2005Closed access

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Hamilton Health Sciences · Population Health Research Institute · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) can be cared for with a routine invasive strategy involving coronary angiography and revascularization or more conservatively with a selective invasive strategy in which only those with recurrent or inducible ischemia are referred for acute intervention. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis that compares benefits and risks of routine invasive vs selective invasive strategies. DATA SOURCES: Randomized controlled trials identified through search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases (1970 through June 2004) and hand searching of cross-references from original articles and reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Trials were…

Citation impact

829
total citations
FWCI
43.24
Percentile
100%
References
39
Citations per year

Authors

11

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Unstable angina
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Internal medicine
  • Odds ratio
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Confidence interval
  • Revascularization
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.