articleThe British Journal of PsychiatryMay 1, 2002BRONZE OA

The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning

Healthcare Technology Systems · King's College London · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Patients' perspectives concerning impaired functioning provide important information. AIMS; To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). METHOD: Data from two studies were analysed. Reliability analyses included internal scale consistency, test-retest and parallel forms. Convergent and criterion validities were examined with respect to disorder severity.

Results

Cronbach's alpha measure of internal scale consistency ranged from 0.70 to 0.94. Test-retest correlation was 0.73. Interactive voice response administrations of the WSAS gave correlations of 0.81 and 0.86 with clinician interviews. Correlations of WSAS with severity of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms were 0.76 and 0.61, respectively. The scores were sensitive to patient differences in disorder severity and treatment-related change.

Citation impact

2,531
total citations
FWCI
22.95
Percentile
100%
References
15
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Cronbach's alpha
  • Psychology
  • Convergent validity
  • Reliability (semiconductor)
  • Scale (ratio)
  • Internal consistency
  • Clinical psychology
  • Correlation
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.

Funding