Randomized Trial of Primary PCI with or without Routine Manual Thrombectomy
Hamilton Health Sciences · McMaster University · +31 more institutions
Abstract
During primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), manual thrombectomy may reduce distal embolization and thus improve microvascular perfusion. Small trials have suggested that thrombectomy improves surrogate and clinical outcomes, but a larger trial has reported conflicting results.
We randomly assigned 10,732 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI to a strategy of routine upfront manual thrombectomy versus PCI alone. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure within 180 days. The key safety outcome was stroke within 30 days.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 68.58
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 20
Authors
33- SSSanjit S. JollyCorresponding
Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Population Health Research Institute
- JAJohn A. Cairns
University of British Columbia
- SYSalim Yusuf
McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute
- BMBrandi Meeks
McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute
- JPJanice Pogue
McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Conventional PCI
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Randomized controlled trial
- Clinical trial
- Percutaneous
- Perfusion
- Surgery
- Good health and well-being