Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?
University of Washington · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Abstract
At the college level, the effectiveness of active-learning interventions is typically measured at the broadest scales: the achievement or retention of all students in a course. Coarse-grained measures like these cannot inform instructors about an intervention's relative effectiveness for the different student populations in their classrooms or about the proximate factors responsible for the observed changes in student achievement. In this study, we disaggregate student data by racial/ethnic groups and first-generation status to identify whether a particular intervention-increased course structure-works better for particular populations of students. We also explore possible factors that may mediate the observed…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 122.68
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 72
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Academic achievement
- Student achievement
- Mathematics education
- Psychological intervention
- Intervention (counseling)
- Psychology
- Student engagement
- Interdependence
- Quality Education