How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?
National Bureau of Economic Research · Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
Most papers that employ Differences-in-Differences estimation (DD) use many years of data and focus on serially correlated outcomes but ignore that the resulting standard errors are inconsistent. To illustrate the severity of this issue, we randomly generate placebo laws in state-level data on female wages from the Current Population Survey. For each law, we use OLS to compute the DD estimate of its “effect” as well as the standard error of this estimate. These conventional DD standard errors severely understate the standard deviation of the estimators: we find an “effect” significant at the 5 percent level for up to 45 percent of the placebo interventions. We use Monte Carlo simulations to investi-gate how…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 567.77
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 25
Authors
3- MBM. BertrandCorresponding
National Bureau of Economic Research
- EDEsther Duflo
National Bureau of Economic Research
- SMSendhil Mullainathan
National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Topics & keywords
- Estimator
- Econometrics
- Autocorrelation
- Standard error
- Series (stratigraphy)
- Standard deviation
- Variance (accounting)
- Statistics
- Decent work and economic growth