articleNew England Journal of MedicineApr 9, 2008BRONZE OA

Long-Term Results of Carotid Stenting versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk Patients

University of Michigan · Piedmont Atlanta Hospital · +8 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

We previously reported that, in a randomized trial, carotid stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is not inferior to carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery disease at 30 days and at 1 year. We now report the 3-year results.

Methods

The trial evaluated carotid artery stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device as compared with endarterectomy in 334 patients at increased risk for complications from endarterectomy who had either a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of at least 50% of the luminal diameter or an asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80%. The prespecified major secondary end point at 3 years was a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days after the procedure or death or ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1080 days (3 years).

Citation impact

830
total citations
FWCI
66.13
Percentile
100%
References
20
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Stenosis
  • Carotid stenting
  • Endarterectomy
  • Stroke (engine)
  • Surgery
  • Stent
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.