articleNew England Journal of MedicineSep 30, 2004BRONZE OA

Caspofungin versus Liposomal Amphotericin B for Empirical Antifungal Therapy in Patients with Persistent Fever and Neutropenia

National Institutes of Health · Merck (France) · +9 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Patients with persistent fever and neutropenia often receive empirical therapy with conventional or liposomal amphotericin B for the prevention and early treatment of invasive fungal infections. Caspofungin, a member of the new echinocandin class of compounds, may be an effective alternative that is better tolerated than amphotericin B.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, multinational trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of caspofungin as compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy. At study entry, patients were stratified according to risk and according to whether they had previously received antifungal prophylaxis. A successful outcome was defined as the fulfillment of all components of a five-part composite end point.

Citation impact

921
total citations
FWCI
40.91
Percentile
100%
References
24
Citations per year

Authors

11

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Caspofungin
  • Amphotericin B
  • Medicine
  • Neutropenia
  • Echinocandin
  • Internal medicine
  • Amphotericin B deoxycholate
  • Discontinuation
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.